Members
Speak Out
Zero Energy
Buildings:
The end of district heating
and cooling?
David W. Wade, PE, President, RDA Engineering Inc.
Editor’s Note: "Members Speak Out" runs in
each issue of District Energy magazine. Its purpose is for a member to briefly share his/her
district energy experiences and opinions – and
obtain feedback from fellow members. If you
have comments on this column, please email
David Wade at the address below - or email
IDEA with your response for publication in the
next issue.
In recent weeks, the news media have
reported professional and trade association goals for cutting future building
energy use by up to 50 percent in the next
three years. The Senate’s Clean Energy Act
of 2007, which is under consideration,
proposes energy-efficiency standards for
commercial buildings that call for a 30
percent decrease in energy consumption
by 2015 and a 50 percent decrease by
2022. The American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers
(ASHRAE), the nation’s chief building energy
code standards organization, has a stated
long-term goal of net zero energy-use
buildings. By 2015, the organization hopes
to have standards in place for producing
commercial buildings that consume 70
percent less energy than buildings built
in 2000.
Many respected civic and professional
organizations are joining the commitment
to building energy conservation. The U.S.
Conference of Mayors has joined the
American Institute of Architects (AIA) to
advocate that all new buildings be carbon
neutral by 2030, using zero fossil fuels to
operate. The AIA’s policy is to promote
sustainable design and conservation practices
to achieve by 2010 a minimum reduction of
50 percent of the current consumption level
of fossil fuels used to construct and operate
buildings. In support of these efforts, more
than 532 mayors representing more than
66 million Americans have signed the Mayors
Climate Protection Agreement. Among
other actions, this agreement commits
participating cities to urge their state governments and the federal government to
enact policies and programs to meet or
beat the greenhouse gas emission reduction target for the United States suggested
in the Kyoto Protocol.
For campus communities, the American
College & University Presidents Climate
Commitment has been signed by 302 presidents of U.S. higher education institutions.
This commitment is a pledge to begin immediately reducing greenhouse gas emissions
and buy renewable energy.
The federal government, the country’s
largest building owner, continues to be
under executive orders requiring significant
energy-use reductions. Private businesses,
too, are voluntarily initiating LEED® (
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)
standards for new buildings and becoming
more sensitive to the public’s desire for
green products and services.
Energy conservation is undoubtedly
good for our nation’s long-term well-being.
I am greatly encouraged by the renewed
interest in energy-use reduction in buildings
exhibited by these and other initiatives. In
fact, I have not seen this much interest in
building energy conservation in 20 years.
Calls for “zero energy buildings,” however,
make me pause. Simply reading that headline brings to mind futuristic-looking buildings with solar collectors, wind mills, etc.,
as power sources. I envision miles of piping
and electrical distribution wires rendered
obsolete by buildings that don’t need energy.
Fortunately for energy suppliers, the
zero energy portion of the headline really
refers to zero fossil energy consumption,
achieved through innovative design, energy
conservation, waste energy recovery and
the purchase of energy from renewable
energy sources. A move to zero energy
buildings should be seen as a great opportunity for district energy rather than as a
move to reduce district energy importance.
No other utility is as intimately involved
with customer buildings or offers a better
opportunity to tailor energy supply to customer wants and needs. District energy
systems are uniquely suited to help customers achieve their conservation goals
and, by working together with them, select
fuel sources that will ensure a sustainable
energy future.
Here are a few suggestions for system
operators wishing to support the zero energy
quest. Become knowledgeable about programs such as LEED, the President’s Executive
Orders, ASHRAE Standard 90, the new
ASHRAE Standard 189 (Design of High-Performance Green Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings), the U.S. Mayors
Climate Protection Agreement and the
A move to zero energy buildings
should be seen as a great oppor-
tunity for district energy rather
than as a move to reduce district
energy importance.
American College & University Presidents
Climate Commitment. Review proposed
legislation and goals set by federal, state
and local communities for renewables and
energy conservation.
Second, evaluate your system for
incorporation of renewable energy sources.